For many OT organisations, Passwordless still feels abstract. The concept is attractive — fewer credentials, fewer attacks, fewer failures — but the practical question remains: how does this actually work inside live, industrial operations where downtime, legacy systems, and safety constraints dominate every decision?
In OT, authentication is not just about logging in. It governs who is allowed to interact with which asset, under what conditions, and for how long — often across disconnected networks and physical sites. This makes OT fundamentally different from the IT environments where most Passwordless models were first designed.
This is why OT-ready Passwordless does not begin with user accounts. It begins with workflows. In recent industrial breach investigations, credential misuse is involved in over half of OT intrusions — not because passwords are weak, but because they are reusable.
Traditional IT security is built around users and systems. OT security is built around tasks and assets.
A maintenance engineer does not simply “log in”. They need to:
OT Passwordless systems reflect this reality by shifting authentication from identity alone to contextual authorisation. Instead of validating a stored credential, the system validates whether a particular action is allowed at that moment, for that asset, by that person.
This approach immediately reduces risk. A task-bound authorisation cannot be replayed, forwarded, or reused — which is exactly why it changes the economics of attack in OT. Even if an identity is compromised, it cannot be reused outside the authorised task or session.
One of the most common concerns is connectivity. Many OT environments operate across segmented networks, air-gapped zones, or unstable links. Traditional IAM systems assume permanent access to central servers. OT cannot.
OT-grade Passwordless uses locally verifiable, time-limited authorisations. These may be delivered as one-time codes, cryptographic tokens, or task-bound credentials that:
This is the principle behind OTAC (One-Time Authentication Code), where each approval is cryptographically bound to a single action rather than a reusable identity.
This allows secure access even when systems are isolated — and prevents credentials from becoming long-lived attack tools.
Passwordless in OT does not replace everything overnight. In practice, it is layered on top of what already exists. Most deployments start by integrating with:
Passwordless is then applied to high-risk or high-friction actions: contractor access, privileged maintenance tasks, or critical asset zones. Over time, organisations reduce reliance on standing credentials and shift towards session- and task-based access.
This is how OT organisations modernise trust without disrupting operations.
In OT, compliance is not satisfied by knowing that someone logged in. It requires knowing:
Passwordless systems designed for OT embed evidence into every access event. Because authorisation is bound to a specific task and asset, every action is automatically traceable — even when networks are offline and logs are synchronised later.
This turns authentication into a compliance and forensic tool, not just a gatekeeper. For regulators and boards, this means access becomes provable — not assumed — even when systems are offline.
For operators, Passwordless reduces friction without sacrificing safety. Access becomes:
For security teams, it removes the most dangerous weakness in OT: reusable credentials. There is nothing to steal, nothing to replay, and nothing that grants open-ended access. And for management, it creates a foundation for Zero Trust and regulatory readiness without forcing disruptive re-architectures.
In IT, Passwordless is often seen as a feature.
In OT, it becomes infrastructure.
It reshapes how access, safety, compliance, and resilience are delivered across distributed, industrial operations. As OT environments continue to digitise, decentralise, and open to third parties, static credentials simply cannot keep up.
Passwordless is not about how users log in. It is about how operations remain trustworthy when everything else is changing.
In 2026, the difference between a secure plant and a disrupted one will often be decided by whether access was static — or truly one-time.
--------------------
swIDch will continue its quest to innovate and pioneer next-generation authentication solutions. To stay up-to-date with the latest trends sign up to our newsletter and check out our latest solutions.